Voyeurism can teach us more about ourselves than the objects of our desire.

The boys behind the narration in The Virgin Suicides are incomplete. Their quest to know the girls, having failed, has stayed with them well into adulthood. And still, they are left with few answers, only the clarity of growing up to give their hindsight a kind of fond regret. But as a midlife reader, I think there is something valuable about nostalgia and uncertainty. I think that this novel is far more brilliant than I ever realized when I read it for the first time.
The Virgin Suicides is a spectacular novel. Dreamy and elegiac, the book subjects us to the narrow perspective of teen boys and their objectification of the girls they claim to adore. I don’t doubt that they loved the girls, in their way. They aren’t duplicitous. They are simply naive. And that kind of unreliable narration is some of my favorite in literature. I would say Mr. Stevens in The Remains of the Day is somewhat similar.
Unreliable narration forces us to uncover some hard truths about what we claim to know and how we lie to ourselves about the things we don’t. In Eugenides’ debut novel, specifically, we assume the role of unworldly teen boys, paired with the retrospective wisdom of middle age. Taking part in the voyueristic exercises the boys were once so faithful in upholding, we have to ask ourselves: what did it all mean?
The Virgin Suicides – A Collective Lack of Insight
I’ve talked about my love for Jeffrey Eugenides several times on TikTok. Middlesex is one of my favorite novels of all time. The prose is lyrical and compassionate, with a generational story so soundly built, you can’t help but feel deeply attached to everyone involved. But what he does with The Virgin Suicides is equally unforgettable.
We also get something wonderful with this novel that we aren’t privy to in many others: we know why Eugenides wrote it the way that he did. In The Guardian, Eugenides details an encounter he had with a teenage babysitter. While watching his nephew, she admitted to Eugenides that she, and all of her sisters, had attempted suicide. This was shocking news, especially considering the girl’s age and her seemingly “untroubled” attitude.
For Eugenides, this revelation birthed the beginnings of a story, in which a family of young girls all attempt, and (spoiler alert) succeed, to kill themselves.

With this being his first novel, Eugenides felt he had to place certain limitations on himself. As a man in his 30s, he sensed he was incapable of really getting into the minds of the girls to “present their inner lives.” So, he stuck with what he knew: what it felt like to be a young boy enamored with the mysterious allure of girls. He fixated on the roads in the neighborhood and community routines. He adopted a collective “we” narration of young males, who, like himself, possessed a limited understanding of the teenage girl psyche.
From their perspective, we join them in their obsession. We only know what they know, and as it turns out, that is very little. But the issue of ignorance isn’t forced. It’s more like an appealing feature of the narrative.
Because not knowing is a part of adolescence, and uncertainty is the hallmark of the high school experience. What hurts is when that limited knowledge continues to torment us into adulthood, as it does here.
Confronted by the Unknown: The Disappointment of Understanding Desire
When I was a teen, I was in love with Leonardo DiCaprio. Like most 90s teen girls, I had seen Romeo + Juliet, and I was hooked. I needed to know EVERYTHING about this man. I was buying copies of Vanity Fair and Teen Bop with every dollar I had. I watched every movie and TV appearance with a keen eye, connecting what was on the screen with what I’d heard in interviews. But even then, that’s only what he was willing to admit. Who knows what was fact and what was fiction?
Much like the boys, who piece together the girls from rumors and purloined grocery lists, I only knew what I had been able to scavenge from People Magazine and Entertainment Tonight interviews, without ever speaking to Leo directly. Much to my disappointment!
In 2018, The New Yorker columnist Emma Cline wrote that the boys were ultimately motivated by a need to validate their authority in telling the story of the Lisbon girls. And the only way to do that was to amass as much information about them as possible. I find this to be true, as no one had more DiCaprio memorabilia than I did, and whenever his name came up during lunch or recess, everyone deferred to my knowledge. Oddly, that felt pretty good.
The seemingly endless quest to know the unknowable is intoxicating. I guess we all have a need to discover. It’s why Elon is so obsessed with space and why hundreds of people still try to top Everest. There is an innate human need to KNOW.
But sometimes the knowing destroys the fantasy. This happens to the boys when they get to see the Lisbon sisters up close. Their imaginations are deflated by what they consider ordinary. Perhaps the boys don’t really want to know them at all. Maybe it’s much more satisfying to use them as blank canvases with which to project their desires. Why confront the unbelievable truth? The girls are just average girls, totally uninterested in the boys’ attentions.
When Leonardo DiCaprio started dumping his supernaturally gorgeous girlfriends once they turned 25, I thought it better to know as little about his true nature as possible.
Shattering the Illusion: Fetishization and Male Gaze
The novel’s enduring success is dependent upon the Male Gaze, penetrating and incomplete. When Lit Hub’s Emily Temple re-read the novel in 2018, she was worried that it wouldn’t hold up: “Honestly, I thought that a novel so dependent on the male gaze would annoy me in 2018.”

Luckily, that wasn’t the case, and Temple regarded the novel with the same affection as before. She realized that the male gaze was not just the cheap device of a novice writer. It was a sophisticated interpretation of how boys view girls, which was honest then and even more valid today.
Now, I can see why some people might find that gross. Why would I want to expose myself to the way men (because the narrators are adults by the time they share their story) view women, or in this specific case: why would I want to know what men think of dead girls?
I think it’s important to discuss the objectification and fetishization of the Lisbon sisters in the novel. The essential components of the male gaze, getting pleasure from looking at the desired object and the narcissistic satisfaction of inserting oneself into the fantasy, play out elaborately in this tight narrative. The narrators are consumed by the girls’ every move, going so far as to dig through the trash to retrieve a freshly un-bodied tampon. But they are only interested in the girls because of what it reveals about themselves.
The girls are treated like objects, and they are deemed worthy of this objectification for a variety of reasons: their beauty, their misery, and their innocence. All of these are definitions the boys apply to the Lisbon sisters. In doing this, they create worlds of meaning within themselves and spend the entirety of the novel trying to prove themselves right.
A huge benefit of the male gaze is confirming that the object of that gaze is worthy of adoration and obsession. If the object is deemed undeserving, the fascination loses its appeal, and the subject must re-evaluate his own taste.
When this happens to the boys, they do turn inward. They develop a sense of self-awareness and begin to wonder what role they may have played in the girls’ isolation. They loved the girls, sure, but they never tried to help the girls. As soon as they got close to them, the girls’ mysterious power over them dissolved.
The Female Fascination with True Crime
While the novel’s central theme relies on the male gaze, women are not exempt from perverse objectification. It’s become almost trendy for women to do this with true crime media. According to a 2023 Pew Research Center study, women are twice as likely to listen to true crime podcasts as men.
Our contemporary obsession with murderers, spurned lovers, and abused children has reached a lucrative fever pitch. While crimes have always found a captive audience, there are entire television networks now devoted exclusively to true crime docs, interrogation videos, and multi-episode deep dives into infamous serial killers. True crime is also one of the most popular genres for podcasts, with over 20,000 of them available.
Now you might be saying, “Hey, they’re not the same!” While the mystery element is intoxicating, especially when experienced from the safety of the sofa, there may be a an evolutionary reason for women’s fascination with true crime. It can help us recognize potential threats.
Much like the boys, women who enjoy (if that’s the right word to use) true crime stories are engaging with unknowable subjects to gain insight into themselves. In some ways, it might seem like this thirst for knowledge about a case brings us closer to it, but it only seeks to create a safe distance.
It’s like the clickbait articles where a young, 20-something is suffering from Stage 4 colon cancer, and many of the comments ask the same thing: What were your symptoms? These comments might be coming from a place of genuine concern, but more likely, they are coming from a place of prevention. I want to know what you experienced so I can avoid what happened to you.

I believe this fascination with true crime, in the form of neatly named podcasts and popular network shows, can veer into the unethical. Much like the disgust we (and I’m speaking as a woman now) feel when we’re confronted with the male gaze, the obsession with true crime results in a similar objectification of victims and the glorification of perpetrators.
As a woman, when I think about The Virgin Suicides, I consider the perspective of the mother. Her overprotective and authoritarian parenting was most definitely a major factor in the girls’ decisions to take their lives. Maybe my fascination with it is in choosing not to replicate her mistakes.
What The Virgin Suicides Tells Us about Ourselves
There is something captivating about being told a story by someone you can’t trust. It’s like a puzzle. What is the author trying to hide? What is really being said? And it’s quite rewarding when all the pieces we see merge with the ones we’ve imagined to create a complete picture. But at the end of the day, we care most about how this shapes our own perspective.
Much like the boys who felt that they’d “been too infatuated to listen” to the girls’ cries for help, we can become too wrapped up in our projections of fear and anxiety to honestly connect with our own morbid curiosity. No one wants to suffer. No one wants to see a life cut off prematurely. But we can’t help but make it about us somehow.
We’re always searching for meaning, trying to validate what we think we know. But in most cases, this is impossible.
For me, that’s the power of The Virgin Suicides. No matter how much you try, you can never really know someone. You’ll never get into someone’s mind. What you end up with is a projection, a story that you’ve created for yourself that serves you in some way. The boys attempted to develop a deeper connection to the girls and failed. But they did succeed in creating self-awareness for themselves. They accept their own loss of innocence as they grapple with the futile exploration of mysteries that will never be solved.
It’s the unsatisfying realization that you’ve grown up. And Eugenides is a master because he pressures us to accept this as well.






































